Harvey Weinstein jury breaks until next week, no verdict yet

Harvey Weinstein arrives at New York Criminal Court during jury deliberations in his sexual assault trial in the Manhattan borough of New York City. Picture: Lucas Jackson/Reuters

Harvey Weinstein arrives at New York Criminal Court during jury deliberations in his sexual assault trial in the Manhattan borough of New York City. Picture: Lucas Jackson/Reuters

Published Dec 15, 2022

Share

Los Angeles – The jurors in the former producer Harvey Weinstein trial in Los Angeles will resume deliberations on Monday, after failing to reach a verdict over a span of more than eight days.

They began deliberating on December 2 and have since discussed the case for about 37 hours, reports “Variety”.

Weinstein, 70, is facing seven charges of rape and sexual assault, stemming from four alleged victims.

If convicted, he could face up to 60 years to life in prison, in addition to the 23-year sentence he is serving on his conviction in New York.

On Wednesday, the jurors asked to have some testimony read back to them, indicating that they are still sifting through the witnesses’ allegations.

The court reporter is expected to read that testimony on Monday, as the courtroom will be closed on Thursday and Friday.

Through the course of their deliberations, the jury has asked one question and also requested twice to have testimony read back.

Judge Lisa B Lench has opted not to reveal the jury’s questions to the media.

With little information available, it’s impossible to decipher if the jury is focused on anything in particular, whether they may be stuck on a certain witness, or if they are taking their time through the process.

“The court is aware that there have been inquiries from the press regarding the contents of juror questions sent to the court,” the judge said on Wednesday.

“The contents of the communications reveal the deliberative process of the currently deliberating jury.

“As such, the court believes it would be inappropriate to release to the press the contents of the communications prior to the discharge of the jury as it would impinge on the deliberative processes of the jury.”

The 12-person jury is made up of three women and nine men. They must reach a unanimous decision on each of the seven charges.

In addition to the four Jane Doe accusers, the prosecution called four other “prior bad acts” witnesses to try to establish a pattern of misconduct. The trial has now lasted more than two months, including jury selection.